Neon · Growth

Upgrade Flow Redesign

Reducing friction in the path from free to paid without the hard sell.

Head of Design · Oct 2024

Upgrade Flow Redesign

47% of users abandoned Neon's upgrade flow mid-way through. Only 15% converted to any paid tier within their first week. 2% reached Business. The product wasn't the problem. Users couldn't make sense of what they were being asked to decide.

I redesigned the upgrade experience end to end. Clearer tier hierarchy, smarter defaults, reduced confirmation steps. The goal was to make upgrading feel like a confident decision, not a commitment to something they didn't fully understand.

+7%
Paid conversions
13%
Fewer mid-upgrade drop-offs

The Problem

The original upgrade flow blended all pricing tiers together with weak visual distinction. No clear hierarchy. Value propositions that didn't map to what users actually cared about. A multi-step process that required selecting a tier, clicking upgrade, then confirming again before anything happened.

Users weren't hesitating because they didn't want to pay. They were hesitating because the flow gave them no confidence they were making the right choice.

Original Neon upgrade modal

The original modal. Tiers blended together, weak hierarchy, no clear path to Business.

Goals

User Goals

Understand what each tier offers and why it matters
Confidently choose the right fit without second-guessing
No hidden costs or surprises at checkout

Business Goals

Increase upgrade conversion, especially to Business tier
Reduce friction and build trust at the key monetization moment
Position Neon as a platform that scales with customers

Hypothesis

If we increase the distinction between pricing tiers and clarify the value of each, especially Business, we will drive higher upgrade confidence and improve trial-to-paid conversion.

Competitive Analysis

I audited upgrade and pricing flows across 8 SaaS products to understand what the best ones got right. A few clear patterns emerged:

Focus on key differences between tiers, not exhaustive feature grids
Use recommended defaults to guide decisions without removing choice
Minimize confirmation steps. The longer the path, the higher the drop-off
Surface billing details upfront. Surprises at checkout kill confidence
Competitor pricing flow reference 1
Competitor pricing flow reference 2
Competitor pricing flow reference 3
Competitor pricing flow reference 4
Competitor pricing flow reference 5

The Solution

The redesigned modal consolidated the upgrade experience into a single, focused view. Strong type hierarchy separated tiers clearly. A recommended tag surfaced based on user behavior. Current usage visible before committing. One fewer step to complete the upgrade.

Redesigned Neon upgrade modal
Clear tier hierarchy with simplified content per plan
Recommended tag surfaced based on activation behavior
Current usage visible before upgrading to reduce hesitation
Contact Sales CTA for enterprise-scale customers

Outcomes

Released October 2024.

Paid conversions increased 7%
Support tickets related to pricing confusion decreased
Business Tier adoption improved among activated users
The design was adopted as the foundation for Neon's broader pricing and billing redesign across Marketing and the Billing team

Learnings

Pricing flows are trust moments as much as conversion moments. Users aren't just deciding whether to pay. They're deciding whether they believe the product will deliver. Every element that reduces clarity is a vote against confidence.

The recommended tag was the highest-leverage single change. Giving users a signal that someone had already thought about the right choice for them removed decision paralysis without removing agency. Small surface area, meaningful impact.

This work ended up shaping more than the modal. The hierarchy and framing we landed here became the reference point when Marketing and Billing rebuilt their pricing pages. That kind of upstream influence is what separates tactical design from strategic design.

© 2026 Carl ThomasBuilt with Claude Code & Next.js